Twenty years after the Rodney King verdict, do people of color see same old justice?

It’s 2012 and some TV channels are looking back at 1992 and commemorating the 20th-Anniversary of the not guilty verdict in the Rodney King trial.  In 1992,the first President Bush left office, and Bill Clinton was elected president.  The Navy confronted the Tail Hook scandal.

Rodney King's image beside that of his biography, "The Riot Within"

1992: I was much younger then, when the not guilty verdict, which still boggles my mind, came down.  The incident left people glued to their TVs, and dumb founded.  There was no Facebook; the internet was an infant, experimental thing.  If you had a cell phone, you had money.  It was the first time that such an attack, by police officers had been recorded and would be used in a trial.  It’s difficult to remember those images and the feelings that they stirred.

During the uprising, Spike Lee & Co. were in the middle of editing his opus “Malcolm X,” and flying to Los Angeles for a meeting with executives at Warner Brothers; Los Angeles was an inferno in a few morose ways.

1991: An irony is that, just one year prior, in 1991, America saw a boon of black-made movies released.   It was more of those than were released during the whole of the 1980s, when Eddie Murphy and Bill Cosby helped to rule entertainment.  Those relative spots of success in entertainment served as notable counterpoints to tragic, vicious pummeling of Mr. King.

2012: Twenty years later, our first-term Kenyan-American president vies for a second one, and above all, after the economy, another opportunity to guide America toward that more perfect union.  America and the world expected, unjustly, that his charisma and oratory would herald a Camelot-like era; one, which would rid us of arguably inevitable color biases and prejudices.

And, yet, a teenager, Trayvon Martin, from Sanford, FL, is dead because George Zimmerman felt threatened.  This weighs on, and divides our society and psyches.  The pummeling of Rodney King, the trial and not-guilty verdict, which followed, did too.

Optimism?  Another Rodney King tragedy could occur this year; some people would handily argue that Mr. Martin’s killing is that one.

My god: what 20 years can wreak, and remind us of?

Let me just ask: with Trayvon Martin still on-screen, how does the world see brown men?

The perception of brown and black men has improved little since President Barack Obama came into office.  Three years ago in America, with a brown-skinned, and kinky-haired man as its president, it seemed inevitable to presume, or at least assume that that would herald seismic improvements in how the US, or the world at-large appreciates and understands men of African descent.  The latest media spectacles provide examples of that, making some bow and shake their heads in response.

Co-star, César award winner, Omar Sy, dances in "Intouchables" from 2011

One image and message, which are often one and the same, is the young black man.  Recently, two images, and their innate problems, have captivated imaginations, and ideas of “justice,” in the U.S.  The most troubling and divisive is the killing of Trayvon Martin, and the incomprehensibly late arrest of his assailant.  Somehow Mr. Martin was perceived as the stereotypical menacing, young black man.  That’s best described, in the 1993 film “Menace II Society:” young, black, and don’t give a fuck.  Another is a French film, “Intouchables,” from 2011, which is so popular that one-third of France, 20-milllion people, has seen it.  One Minnesota scholar of French compared it to “Driving Miss Daisy.”  The lead character, Driss, is a young, ne’er do well black man, from Senegal, who has a complex personal history, and a basic criminal one.  Driss is a handsome, irrepressible, immature man stuck in the life that often exists in the metropolitan ghettos of France, as it does in America’s.  He becomes a health aide to a rich, quadriplegic French man, serving as a conditional confidante; and as a muse to venture beyond his singular and insular comfort zone.

“Intouchables” is amusing, but if you’re prone to thoughtfully watch movies, you’ll probably notice a bevy of story tropes.

Both images, of Trayvon Martin in life and Driss in fiction, as an intouchable, harken to stereotypes, even story tropes: Trayvon was killed by a man who totes some heavy mental and cultural baggage in regard to young, black men.  To him, that character was more of a bogeyman, and less a man, less of flesh and blood.  He found and killed Mr. Martin In such a mentality.  For Mr. Zimmerman, somehow a young, clean-cut brown-skinned man, carrying Skittles resembled the ghetto monster, O-Dog, in “Menace II Society.”

Larenz Tate, as O-Dog, in "Menace II Society" from 1993.

The darker, the blacker, the more self-assured a man is, he is also that much less likely he is to be gullible, and swallow or see himself reflected in those silly, and destructive messages.  So, he poses a greater the threat; he will not be controlled.

The more I live, grow and learn, it seems like the folks, who are the most likely to turn over their leaves from prejudice to progress are those who need a mere nudge.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.