“The Names of Love” is a fantastic French romantic dramedy about two clashing lovers

“The Names of Love” (« Les noms des gens » in French) is a story, from director Michel Leclerc, that one could easily say is “so French.”  It pits Baya Benmahmoud (Sara Forestier), a 20-something, hypersexual, left-winger, born of an Algerian dad, against Arthur Martin (Jacques Gamblin) a middle-aged healthcare professional born of a Jewish mom.  They clash politically and ideologically.  But they face an undeniable chemistry despite occasionally rational thought.

This shows at the Edina Cinema for a week from August 26th.

Baya Benmahmood (Sara Forestier) is a lefty charmer in "The Names of Love" (courtesy Music Box Films)

Still each tries to be rational because they don’t know how they could be together and not go nuts, or kill each other, if not both!  Arthur is the story’s star, but also Baya’s milquetoast straight man in this fantastic, joyous and hilarious story.

The first scene is indelible.  Arthur is on-air on the radio in the middle of discussing bird flu on a call-in show.  Baya shows up at the station for work, screening the show’s calls.  Finding his ideas dangerous, she abandons her cube and barges into the studio, and then calls Arthur out, with animated zeal.

The story follows this clashing couple’s relationship from accidental meetings to meant ones and the milestones.  Their romance’s absurd comedy feels like a smart version of Abbott & Costello.

After that auspicious beginning they go to an eatery where Baya offers Arthur sex on the first date – that’s her policy.  She strikes him dumb and speechless, and he flees the awkwardness and opportunity.  His daily luck with women?  Let’s put this way: to steal a line from The Prince of Tides: “he had the opposite of the Midas touch!”

Baya meets Arthur's conservative parents in "The Names of Love" (courtesy Music Box Films))

The first act’s mania and hilarity follow the first sequence’s lead: Baya and Arthur each tells us how they were brought up and by what sort of parents.  Arthur’s memory plays games on him, and in-turn on the story.  For example: he can’t imagine his dad when he was young.  No matter how young he should be in his son’s flashback, like as a college freshman he looks like a retiree, and loopily out-of-place.  It’s often hilarious.  It works.  With Baya, there’s less drama.  Her mom was a daughter of middle-class privilege who rebelled, eventually loving an Algerian, a former soldier.  Her memory plays tricks in different, subtler ways.

Her sexual conduct and attitude has a political agenda.  She lives by the creed “make love, not war.”  She uses it as a weapon, as another prong of rhetoric.  Kind of like a one-off from Carl VonClausewitz’s “On War:” a continuation of political struggle by erotic or erotic and rhetorical means.  She uses her erotic and sensual skills to convert her conservative foes to her way of seeing.

Strolling in "The Names of Love" (courtesy Music Box Films)

“The Names of Love” provides a bounty of charming, witty, amusing characters, scenes and sequences and touches of technique.  And these at such a quick pace that we’re swept up.  It’s not profound.  It is a profound gem in how it can make a viewer smile, chuckle and then guffaw.

Other sight gags: in other important scenes, the camera plays with point of view. This works some subtly potent wonders; it shows a two-shot of a couple, that makes sense, and then pans to reveal a third wheel that changes the scene’s meaning entirely.

Because of temporary “lessons” with her piano teacher as a child, subtly played out, the college-aged Baya holds none of a common sexual or erotic conservatism that’s familiar to most Americans.  If a tit peaks or bounds out of her often loose blouse by accident, it’s a non-event to her.

In one of the many memorable sequences they meet accidentally each other at a polling place.  There, she offers him sex again.  On the way to that, they stop at a grocery.  In line, she flees to find the last vital ingredient, coriander.

And then her scattered brain goes full-tilt: she runs into someone.  He reminds her to make a 180 degree change in plans.  Not toreturn to Arthur, but to prepare for a party.  She goes home to collect something, strips, forgets to dress, and then leaves home to take care of yet another scatterbrained errand.  On the way, she passes the market, naked save for boots.  Arthur, incredulous, seesher.  He’s still waiting for her inside.  This concisely summarizes the movie’s looniness and charms.

Baya and Arthur charm each other in "The Names of Love" (courtesy Music Box Films)

La pièce de résistance: before the mania of that sequence ends Baya winds up on a train flashing a Muslim couple the female half of which is dressed in what is almost a burqa.

This witty, funny, often hilarious film will suit you whether or not you want to think; it provides an intelligent escape.  The romance’s common peaks and valleys are drawn with great gaiety.

Share

“If a Tree Falls” preaches to the leftist choir as it tells us about a group of “environmental terrorists”

“If a Tree Falls” is a feature-length documentary, by Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman, about a group of environmental activists who go way beyond the call of duty – to a violent edge of it.  They are the Earth Liberation Front. “If a Tree Falls” clearly sympathizes with this group, which the FBI calls “domestic terrorists.”

The Environmental Liberation Front acts (courtesy Oscilloscope Laboratories)

This film doesn’t run down a history of the movement, or even the psychology behind that.  It describes some incidents that led to the domino-effect arrests of a cell.  The film concentrates on the cell’s principal personalities: Dan McGowan, Suzanne Savoie, Jake Ferguson, and one or two other outstanding ones.  This story tells of the offenders on the extreme left, and not the offended.  Those offenders may feel that the mainstream media had taken their foes’ side.  The question of who’s the offended may be disputable.  But those whom the ELF attacked are barely heard.

“If a Tree Falls” may be righteous.  But also self-righteous.  This film shows at Minneapolis’ Lagoon Cinema for a week starting on July 22nd.

A clear bias toward the extreme leaves the film’s point-of-view weak. The bias is about 60-40 or even 70-30 in voices in favor of the extremists or terrorists.  The centrist viewers, who are against violence with this cause, are left with valid, yet open questions. Those centrists won’t be convinced by a tale of how a docile McGowan slipped into this conviction.  Objective, non-partisan voices would keep viewers’ attention.  How will they respond when they find that in fact, with one battle, McGowan, Savoie and their compatriots torched a lumber location based on false information?

Mr. McGowan describes a few cracks in his reasoning and decision-making.  Several voices, including his, explain why he, the focal character, decided that confrontation was a superior, more potent path to waking-up the offenders than mid-20th-Century tactics: marching, singing, chanting, picketing and the like.

Poster image (courtesy of Oscilloscope Laboratories)

Only a few voices discuss the innocents who are bunched in with the worst violators, and hurt.  Only a couple of voices consider the lumber industry’s efforts to do good.  Some of the best documentaries may not carry an agenda, but instead a reportorial, objective point of view.  This one informs, entertains and might enlighten viewers, especially in terms of “preaching to the choir.”  The want for a moderate and balanced voice is disappointing.

With the film’s faults, it’s a good, clear, almost well told story of this sect’s work.  This film is worth watching, but DVD will suffice.

It’s easy to sympathize with the zealots’ desire for faster, more satisfying results: those, which are more progressive and aggressive than typical 20th-Century tactics.  Faster than diplomacy.  But it takes a certain gut and heart to move from the fantasy of revenge to urban or guerilla combat.  I doubt that many or even most viewers share that one with these former ELF members.

“If a Tree Falls” uses interview footage with the characters almost exclusively.  It’s a late 20th-Century story of violent protestors; other than news clips, there isn’t archival or behind-the-scenes footage.  It provides reenactments of specific details shots; it uses animation, in lieu of banal, traditional live-action reenactments of some criminal scenes, in an amusing, playful, refreshing way.

This film poses large ideological, legal and moral questions: who is a terrorist?  What is terrorism?  Does each form of terrorism pose an equal threat.

“Rejoice and Shout” spreads the good news – Gospel’s history

“Rejoice and Shout” is a feature-length documentary, from director Don McGlynn, about the history of Gospel music.  It’s described as a rhythmic, ancestral pillar that African-Americans used to sustain themselves and to keep sane during their centuries in slavery.  It told the audience that, at least at church, beyond the anglo gaze, “I am Somebody!”

One of the Blind Boys groups (courtesy Magnolia Pictures)

A staple of the documentary genre is cutting between archival and interview footage.  This film does that.  It tells an interesting, surprising and entertaining story, omitting any dogma that you might expect.  It runs down the time-line of the genre and its innovations, some typical, others “unholy.”

It shows at the Edina Cinema for a week starting on July 8.  This documentary provides a who’s who of the indelible and most potent Gospel artists, also dredging up memories of folks who time might have forgotten.  “Rejoice and Shout” makes clear that as long as the music is understood as honoring God, then it should please Him and in-turn his followers.

It tells about Gospel music’s pivotal personalities, trends and game-changing innovations, it tells about clashing sensibilities of faith and styles of music.  At the heart of some innovations  is a question:  isn’t it unholy marry rap with gospel, or blues with gospel, or any popular music with that pious one?

Mavis Staples (courtesy Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

This story tells us how Thomas A. Dorsey, while ultimately revered, caught hell for having mixed the blues with Gospel, making what some considered heretical.  (Ray Charles had similar clashes when he took those chances.)  It tells us how Rosetta Tharpe, who may be less known than Mavis Staples, inspired the latter to take up the guitar; before Ms. Tharpe did it, Ms. Staples hadn’t known that it was possible.  And without the Dixie Hummingbirds, The Temptations might not’ve been.

Many documentaries are more creative, with editing, location and other choices, and take chances with their storytelling.  “Rejoice and Shout” is a strong, competent film.

“Circo” is a family drama that boils within a tiny Mexican circus

“Circo” is a 75-min documentary, by Aaron Schock, about a family-run Mexican Circus.  This is a very interesting tale of a job on the margins, in a country, Mexico, that’s on the margins of the Western world’s media radar.  In “Circo,” a family, the Ponces, is born into, grows up in and lives and works in its own small, struggling family-run circus.  Compromises, troubles and strained & clashing loyalties make the circus that is the family and its work.

A grand entrance (courtesy Hecho a Mano Films)

The Mexican economy isn’t kind or gentle to this family.  Too many small-scale circuses compete among one another for dwindling and poor audiences.  Ironically the Ponces are among them.

This opens at Minneapolis’ Lagoon Cinema for a week on May 20th.

The circus is surviving, squeezing out enough money for the Ponces to subsist. Theirs is a nomadic lifestyle.  They’re nomadic entertainers in a world that has little use for that entertainment; their story is special, maybe unique.

The mom, Ivonne Ponce, wants her children go to school, to prepare to have choices and careers away from the circus.  Instead the dad, Tino Ponce, was raised holding his loyalty to parents above all (where his dad relies on and expects him to keep the one successful family circus afloat).  His father has three other sons, each of whom is struggling with his own circus.

Ponce daughters preened to promote Circo Mexico (courtesy Hecho a Mano Films)

The children want for a 20th-Century childhood, with playtime, school and neighborhood playmates.  This brand of childhood, before labor laws and longer life expectancies, takes us back the eras when people toiled until their 30s, and didn’t know a playful youth.  There’s a scene, just beside the entry to a trailer, where grandpa trains his youngest grand daughter in contortion; as she cries and wails it brings back images from the abusive training that made parts of Jet Li and Jackie Chan’s training infamous.

This documentary raises several interesting topics about family loyalty, zeal for “old-time” or “by-gone” values, work ethic and child rearing; unto themselves these are worthy of an essay, but not here.  Very few movies deal with any of these in smart or interesting ways, much less all in one story.

“Circo” gives us a gander at a way of living, of working, of loving and is foreign to the U.S.  It’s a well-told tale that deserves to be scene.  Even though the final act is confused about its purpose or how it wants to leave us; it should be trimmed by 15-minutes – it drags.

Share

“Potiche” is a French retro farce of sexual & workplace politics, which might remind you of “Nine to Five”

“Potiche” a French farce of sexual politics, set in the 1970s is an amusing, campy and retro story.   This story of a trophy wife (the translation of potiche) who takes her CEO husband’s place at the umbrella factory, which he claimed from the marriage.

This feels like a flipside telling of the 1980 workplace comedy movie, “Nine-to-Five.”  The look, feel is out-dated, but that retro view helps to make this basically smart, but also shallow story amuse us.

“Potiche” takes place when the U.S. was amid its feminist and labor revolutions, which were also marked by “women’s work” sections of the newspaper want ads.

Landmark Theatres’  shows this at the Edina Cinema for a week from April 29th.

There is une petite leçon beyond the campy and ironical comedy.  It’s worth seeing.

POM’s “The Greatest Movie Ever Sold” is an irreverent way to scratch at some truths

“The Greatest Movie Ever Sold” shows us the sausage making involved in product placement in movies.  As Morgan Spurlock peeled back the onion of Mickey D’s in 2004′s “Supersize Me,” this year’s documentary comedy shows us, and him, in the process of wooing companies to pay for his movie, and in-turn being cast in it as the lead and supporting characters or topics.   Along the way they are examples of how those companies or brands have changed movies.

In Mr. Spurlock’s routine, nearly inimitable style, “The Best Movie Ever Sold” starts with him just now considering how well his crazy idea will fly with the American Nasdaq-type brands, whose concern about brand management and protective public relations flirts with paranoia.

(courtesy Sony Classics)

Landmark Theatre’s Uptown Theater plays this for a week starting on April 29th.

A bunch of mid-level brands stakes their claims to Mr. Spurlock’s viewers: POM Wonderful, a healthy pomegranate drink, Sheets (a gas station & eatery), Ban, Mini-Cooper, Hyatt hotels, Jet Blue and Mane & Tail among mid-length list of others.  That last one beats it all; it’s a shampoo for the horse and human markets, both!  Wow.

It must’ve been awkward and embarrassing when Morgan asks the Ban Roll-on  folks what words or phrases describe or typify their product: the marketing execs were struck dumb!  Hmm, no need to wonder why they called their company a small, scrappy company that could.

This is an amusing, witty exposé of brand placement or brand integrated movies.  Mr. Spurlock includes a few ads within the movie, sweetening the pot for his highest paying sponsors.  That’s an irony for those viewers who resent the Generation-Y norm of seeing TV commercials slapped onto a 70-foot screen, before or among the trailers.

All Spurlock family, Morgan and son, praise to Jet Blue? (courtesy Sony Classics)

Mr. Spurlock’s bottom-line is one that often lays on the track between money and art.   The question of artistic independence is big for the filmmaker.  That question: how much to sell-out?  One of the many artistic and financial questions: how much artistic control does he cede to his sponsors; how much of a whore is he willing to become?

A score?  See it.  Enjoy it.  Consider the meat inside the loony package.

Share

“The Princess of Montpensier” reminds us that wars have been fought over women

“The Princess of Montpensier” is a costume romantic drama, from Bertrand Tavernier, and set in the 1500s.  The fight over the princess’ favors reminds us of what much of classical poetry and literature has observed: “wars have been fought over the favors of a woman.”

This is an era that damns the men, even the kingdom and dooms her.  Marie (Mélanie Thierry) is torn between two men, two cousins’ love (unrelated to her).  One she wants, Henri de Guise (Gaspard Ulliel).  The other, who she doesn’t, Prince de Montpensier, (Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet) but her father does – for politics and property.  He coerces her into marrying the prince, but the prince is too young and too immature to be a good match for his newly arranged wife.

poster (courtesy Flickr/Creative Commons)

This will be showing at Landmark Theatres’ Edina Theater for a week from Aprill 22nd.

This princess’ life and the story become more fraught when we see that all the men who spend a lot of time around the princess are enchanted by her, succombing to her assets.  The prince’s mentor and tutor, the Comte de Chabannes (Lambert Wilson) a gentleman, warrior and scholar – a rarity.  And the prince’s commander, Duc d’Anjou (Raphael Personnaz), also vies for Marie.  While the Comte is deliberate about this, showing his maturity, the Duc is younger, impulsive and urgent (or just lusty) about it.

This is one of those “if only” stories, where you notice that, if not for one road taken, there’d be none of this trouble – but also this intricate story, this romantic and political tumult and suspense wouldn’t interest us.

An exchange tells a lot about the princess’ and the prince’s bond: on their way into his castle…

He asks “When will you love me?”

She says, “When you order me to?”

–If only she didn’t cave in to her dad.

–If only women hadn’t been considered chattel and beasts of burden then.  And head-strong women were such oddities as to be thought mad.

The most interesting subplot belongs to the best-drawn supporting character, the Comte de Chabannes; he’s a warrior turned pacifist.  He laid down his long sword after having killed a very vulnerable woman by accident, but in the heat of a fight.

The romantic and political intrigues are complex to a Shakespearian level.  More than a few shades of truths and lies push Marie, her husband, her tutor and the Comte away from one another – but mostly her.

The beautiful colors used in the costumes and photography overall draw our attention, but the plot, the performances and the plotting over love and lust command that attention.  Those scenic colors are incidental to the great characters and the ways in which their stories clash with one anothers’.

See this film!

The big problem: the more than two hour sitting might make you antsy, even though the story’s great.  Also, if you want sword fights, serious ones from this, you might find the few in this to be pale and shallow.

“The Human Resources Manager” is a strange trip, from Israel, to bury a body

“The Human Resources Manager,” is an Israeli drama, from Eran Riklis, about a Human Resources Manager (Mark Ivanir), without a name, but a title.  He works for a large commercial bakery and has to go above and beyond when a former temp worker is found among the dead at a suicide bombing site.  But when no one claims her at the morgue, a muckraking print reporter rails the bakery for not claiming her.

The bakery chief, concerned about how that story hurts the business, presses the manager to look into a small payroll question that led to the worker having a bakery paycheck on her, but her not being in their other systems.  The HR Manager finds that he’ll have to go with the body and help bury it.  This brief journey for public relations and peace making winds up taking longer than expected and creeps into a set of mid-life-like questions.

Minneapolis’ Lagoon Cinema plays this for a week starting on April 15th.

With each step he takes to fix this PR crisis, he winds up attracting yet one more person, and one more wrinkle, to a simple matter of identifying and burying remains: first he has to satisfy his boss, then after doing that, he finds that she’ll have a bigger problem for him when he returns.

Then he has to find and deal the victim’s widower.  There’s a problem, so he can’t give consent.  Above all, a series of sillier and stranger events make this road to better PR deeper.  They have to see about the woman’s son…  And then there’s a Consul, and a Vice Consul and then their official driver.   But his driver’s license isn’t in order.  Oh, and that muckraking reporter who starte this is also tagging along.  But wait, there’s more…

If this’s a comedy, it’s dry.  Eitan Gorlin’s “The Holy Land,” also Israeli, and from 2001, is funnier, and has more wit.  Similar, equally profound life-deciding questions pop up in this film.  While the characters in “The Human Resources Manager” are only colorful, those in “The Holy Land” are vibrant and more fully drawn.

“The Human Resources Manager” is a good, interesting story that’s well worth a look.

Share

“Winter in Wartime” grabs you as a coming-of-age drama

Coming-of-age movies are common enough that, if you throw a rock at one, you could knock down a bunch at once.  And those good ones that take place during a decisive wartime you can count on a hand.  “Winter in Wartime” (“Oorlogswinter” in Danish) is an intense 2008 drama, from the Netherlands, set in the 1940s from director Martin Koolhoven and Sony Classics.

This shows at the Edina Cinema for a week starting on April 8th.

Michiel rushes to help his father (courtesy Sony Classics)

This poignant drama of a boy’s awakening in wartime opens with 14-year-old Michiel, (Martijn Lakemeier), the mayor’s son, playing with his friend as they scavenge from a just crashed fighter plane in the woods.  Director Koohoven uses a hand-held camera and whimsical music that emphasizes these boys’ carefree life.  That sets the tone for just how much this young man will have to grow up.  Neither Michiel nor his seemingly meek dad knows yet, but he has some pivotal growth and daunting questions before him.

What’s more?  He finds betrayal far closer to home than anyone should.  He’s deeply disappointed by his seemingly meek dad, and uses his uncle, Ben, as his role model.

Young man, Michiel, needs his dad (courtesy Sony Classics)

Michiel wants a project, and a sense of purpose beyond family.  He finds that in Jack, a young Royal Air Force pilot, hiding from the Nazi’s who’ve occupied Denmark.  While it’s a simple act to ferry food to a soldier hiding behind occupied lines, the adventure and sense of purpose help Michiel to feel useful, and beyond his years.  Michiel makes plans for Jack’s escape.  Here Michiel learns to embrace his independence & budding manhood.

But when surprising obstacles come, the stakes rise.  The chances grow perilous and Michiel’s lessons grow harsher, beyond what he could be expected to handle.

And then drama hits his family: his harshest lesson comes when his dad is taken by the Nazis.  He had glad-handed and placated the Nazi’s, presumably to protect his family.  With his dad out of the picture, he relies on uncle Ben even more as a surrogate.  But that brings a crucial and cruel twist for Michiel.

When you feel this movie’s power, you might try to think back to the last movie like this, which affected you as much as this one.  There are very few coming-of-age in wartime movies – timeless ones anyway.  1987′s “Empire of the Sun” comes to mind, and maybe 1990′s “Europa, Europa,” as you scratch your head.  “Summer of ’42,” from 1971, is the most spot-on comparison.

A curious, carefree young man (courtesy Sony Classics)

In “Summer of ’42,” another 14-year-old boy, an American, deals with the mysteries and angst of lust and love, with sexual awakening and self-discovery being the point here.  Michiel’s is just as vital a story, about his sense of identity, political and social questions, and those of what makes a man, a strong man are in play here.

Questions of what it is to be a man – harshness and softness – have abounded for centuries and been answered in as many ways.  “Summer of ’42″ and “Winter in Wartime” each take a good, smart look at both ends of the extremes of manly conduct.

As with many films, this one’s pulse begins to pound as the end approaches.  You never know what twists the final act will bring.  A soul-rattling introduction to betrayal.

Without a number score: See it, ideally at a theater.

Share

“Of Gods and Men” a sleepy, spiritual movie stands its ground

“Of Gods and Men” is the story inspired by true events, from director Xavier Beauvois, about French monks, who stand firm in 1996, against and between two violent forces: Algeria’s corrupt soldiers (along with their offers of protection), and local guerillas.  As adventuresome as that could be, this film demands patience.  This story based on true events comes to Minneapolis’ Lagoon Cinema for a week beginning March 18th.

Head priest Christian among the villagers (courtesy Sony Classics)

“Of Gods and Men” is full of chanting, praying and basic theological discussions among the monks. They are not only men of the Word, but also of words, not of action.  They face dilemmas and discussions.  It must be safer to flee from their monastery, rather than clash with either army.  But they feel called to stay, represent the Word, and a haven for their village.

The priests’ clash with their elected chief priest, Christian, [Lambert Wilson] who is resolute about standing firm against either set of soldiers, for and before God.  His brothers are far less sure about this, or their safety, than him.  He is one of this story’s obvious stars taciturn, self-assured, a man more of thought than of act.  And then there’s an older monk.  He’s the aging doctor, Luc, [Michael Lansdale] who’s sage and witty, but is becoming less agile and ill.

This’s a contemplative film: the story emphasizes pauses and context, giving us poetic shots of the village landscape.  While many movies are “showy,” providing a lot of drama and activity – consider “Black Swan,” and how its showiness snatched those Oscars! if not action, this’s not one of those.  There’s a difference between a story that’s patient and one that’s slow.  Patient is 2003′s “The Station Agent,” where you click with the characters and how their stories intersect.  It’s fun.  They become friends to we viewers, even if that’s only on-screen.  But that’s not “Of Gods and Men.”  That’s slow, but not entirely boring.

The most dramatic scene comes within the first 30-minutes: the lead rebel, Ali Fayattia, [Farid Larbi] comes to the monastery with his squad demanding Christian, and medicine.  Christian eyeballs him and lays down the facts:  what they have is for the villagers, and they have very little.  Surprisingly Ali respects that response.

More discussions (courtesy Sony Classics)

There’s a moving and symbolic scene of spiritual “action” later in their story where and hear a helicopter arrives and loiters above while the brothers sit in their sanctuary while – the din is intimidating and loud.  The brothers rise and begin chanting, more and more loudly.  The juxtaposition is contentious and profound.  Between those, this quiet monks’ story shows how they deal with the impending peril or even their murders.

If you don’t demand action or a lot of mano–a–mano drama among the monks or between they and the soldiers, this might satisfy you.  The story’s so quiet, so subtle, you might not notice.  It might not pop for you.

If we were to score this: 3.5 out of 5.

Share

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.